Alicia Sisk Morris CPA | Methods investors use to evaluate new start-up companies
447
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-447,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-theme-ver-9.0,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-7.9,vc_responsive

Methods investors use to evaluate new start-up companies

29 May Methods investors use to evaluate new start-up companies

  • As a Certified Public Accountant located in Weaverville, NC, situated in the greater Asheville, NC market, it is very common for me to interface with start-up companies. Some companies are set up to be one woman or man operation while others are more complex in nature. For example, Asheville is now considered Beer City USA.  This designation is causing a massive growth in local beer manufacturing. We even have a Beer City Festival. Since these businesses are manufacturing oriented they will, by design, require a larger workforce and substantial capital equipment and facility space. And unless the owners are Vanderbilts, it is likely that they will need to find Angel Investors to help them bring their product to market.

    One of the key steps in an investors’ assessment of a venture is the valuation of the business. According to “Winning Angels the 7 fundamentals of early stage investingwritten by David Amis and Howard Stevenson there are five approaches to valuation.

    1. Quick and easy method

    2. Academic/investment banker method

    3. Professional venture capitalist method

    4. Compensated adviser method

    5. Value later method

    Each of these methods has their pluses and minuses regarding their use and based on your experience and preferences one may be favored over another. During this discussion, I will focus on the quick and easy method as it is a valuation system that works well for early stage investing situations where there is a lack of company history and where there is a high level of unpredictability. That sure sounds like a lot of start-up companies I have seen over the years.

    The five quick and easy methods:

    1) $5M limit – Howard Stephenson states “Never invest in a start-up deal valued over $5 million. This method is simple, fast and manages the outer limits of what an angel investor is comfortable in risking.

    2) Berkus Method– Dave Berkus has created his own investing formula. Typically he spends $200,000 and values the deals based on this formula.

    · Sound idea $1M

    · Prototype +1 M

    · Quality Management team +1-2M

    · Quality Board +1M

    · Roll-out sales +1M

    Thus, the total value will be between $1-6 M

    3) The rule of thirds: With early-stage companies Lucius Cary believes that 1/3 should go to the founders, 1/3 to the capital providers and 1/3 to management.

    4) $2m-$5M angel standard: Most traditional angel investors invest in companies who have valuations of between $2M-5M as they consider that enough money to give the company a reasonable chance of success

    5) $2M-$10M Internet standard: Due to the rapid success of many high-tech startups, there is a willingness to look at companies with a higher valuation point. These types of businesses are usually fast in terms of their development, unfortunately, there is equal potential for the business to be evaluated too high as well.

    So, if you are a company that is considering seeking an influx of venture capital from angel investors it is a good idea to evaluate your company and see how you might fall within each of these parameters. You may also benefit from my blog “Keys to attracting angel investors”.

 

Other Blog Posts of interest:

Funding for Small Businesses

Small Business Retirement Plan Options

Leveraging your retirement savings

Hobby Loss Rule for Small Businesses

Women in Business

New Business Start-up Tips from a CPA

11 Comments
  • Schree Chavdarov
    Posted at 14:51h, 01 June Reply

    The method that jumped out at me while reading your blog was the Lucius Cary rule of thirds. In relation to early-stage companies, the simplicity of this method creates ease and promotes a functional environment.

    • asmcpa@yahoo.com
      Posted at 15:20h, 01 June Reply

      I am also a fan of keeping things simple…the old KISS principle.
      ALicia

    • asmcpa@yahoo.com
      Posted at 16:02h, 10 June Reply

      I agree, simple keeps things clear cut and doesn’t bog down the process. Thanks for sharing.

      Alicia

  • Will Hager
    Posted at 15:45h, 01 June Reply

    What happens if an investor has endless amounts of money and likes taking a little risk? Have you come across any investors that go against these rules? They may fail or they might hit the lottery with an unexpected winner!! Risk sometimes does lead to reward!! I guess all this depends on how conservative an angel is and how comfortable they are with their money and investment!!! Great Post! Very Insightful!!!!! Sometimes rules are meant to be broken!!!!!

    • asmcpa@yahoo.com
      Posted at 17:55h, 01 June Reply

      If you ever watch the TV Show Shark Tank you can see different angel investors level of risk. IF they know a lot about a company’s industry they appear to be willing to take a greater risk. They know their skills will help the company grow. On a personal level, I think the riskiest I have ever seen, and I see it all the time, is people cashing out 401k plans and mortgaging their homes to make a business possible. Sadly, I have also seen some of those folks go bankrupt. Wrong business, wrong time or wrong leadership.

  • Chris Carter
    Posted at 20:02h, 07 June Reply

    This is a well written and insightful post! I find it very interesting that there are so many different ways that investor’s assign value to companies. You would think that all investors would look at risk vs. profitability in the same way and assign a value accordingly.

    • asmcpa@yahoo.com
      Posted at 20:28h, 07 June Reply

      Thanks for your comments. It is amazing how many different ways a company can be evaluated. As they say, there is more than one way to skin a cat (figuratively of course).

      Alicia

  • Serrieh
    Posted at 00:46h, 10 June Reply

    The rule of thirds really sticks out to me and I really like the idea of this. I enjoyed reading your article.

  • Mitch McDowell
    Posted at 14:46h, 22 June Reply

    Alicia,

    I think what hit home for me was that valuations, as long as the fall within a certain range, aren’t overly important for investors. What is important is for investors to able to make a potential desired return on the investment that is high multiple of the original investment.

    Thanks,
    Mitch

  • Maria-Elena Surprenant
    Posted at 03:20h, 30 June Reply

    First off, I did not realize that Asheville is now known as the “beer capital”. My husband and I stayed at the Biltmore for our honeymoon, and we absolutely loved it! We hope to go back and visit more of the town, from what I have heard, it is an artistic community.

    When it comes to the different valuation methods, I tend to lean toward the most simplistic ones, such as the $5M limit.

    • asmcpa@yahoo.com
      Posted at 01:54h, 02 July Reply

      Yes, we have won several national contests and have been proclaimed Beer Capital at the end of the day. We have so many brewers it is really hard to keep up.

Post A Comment